切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (01) : 34 -38. doi: 10.3877/ cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2025.01.006

临床论著

不同方案“鸡尾酒”控制全膝关节置换术后早期疼痛
张天成1, 王黎杰1, 高鹏宇1, 刘旺兴1,2,3, 姜未1,2,3,()   
  1. 1. 518020 深圳,暨南大学第二临床医学院
    2. 518020 深圳市人民医院骨关节外科
    3. 518020 深圳,南方科技大学附属第一医院
  • 收稿日期:2024-07-29 出版日期:2025-02-01
  • 通信作者: 姜未

Different “cocktail” protocol on early pain control after total knee arthroplasty

Tiancheng Zhang1, Lijie Wang1, Pengyu Gao1, Wangxing Liu1,2,3, Wei Jiang1,2,3,()   

  1. 1. The Second Clinical Medical College of Jinan University,ShenZhen 5108020, China
    2. Bone and Joint Department of Shenzhen People’s Hospital, ShenZhen 5108020,China
    3. The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanfang University of Science and Technology, ShenZhen 5108020, China
  • Received:2024-07-29 Published:2025-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Wei Jiang
引用本文:

张天成, 王黎杰, 高鹏宇, 刘旺兴, 姜未. 不同方案“鸡尾酒”控制全膝关节置换术后早期疼痛[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 34-38.

Tiancheng Zhang, Lijie Wang, Pengyu Gao, Wangxing Liu, Wei Jiang. Different “cocktail” protocol on early pain control after total knee arthroplasty[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(01): 34-38.

目的

探讨不同方案“鸡尾酒”对全膝关节置换(TKA)术后早期疼痛控制的效果对比。

方法

回顾性分析2023年1月至2024年6月在深圳市人民医院因骨关节炎行全膝关节置换术的114例患者资料,除外双侧同期置换的患者。依据术中“鸡尾酒”配方和给药方式情况分为4组:含吗啡+关节内灌注组(吗啡灌注组);含吗啡+关节周围注射组(吗啡注射组);不含吗啡+关节内灌注组(灌注组);不含吗啡+关节周围注射组(注射组)。方差分析4组患者术中“鸡尾酒”操作时间、术后24、72 h的视觉模拟评分(VAS)、术后24/72 h膝关节活动度(ROM),卡方检验分析术后72 h内追加止痛药物比例以及术后72 h内不良反应发生情况。

结果

4组患者术后24、72 h的VAS评分(F=0.363、0.474)、术后24、72 h的膝关节ROM(F=0.719、1.606)以及72 h内追加止痛药物比例(χ2=0.259)差异均无统计学意义(均为P>0.05)。术中关节内灌注“鸡尾酒”操作时间(9.5±1.8)s明显少于关节周围注射(41.2±4.9)s (t=47.60,P<0.001),且不含吗啡的两组患者术后72 h内不良反应总体发生率明显低于含吗啡的两组(χ2=8.961,P=0.027),主要表现为恶心呕吐方面(χ2=7.917,P=0.046),而尿潴留、下肢深静脉血栓形成(DVT)以及周围神经损伤等并发症发生情况,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

术中关节内灌注不含吗啡的“鸡尾酒”对TKA术后早期疼痛控制有效,术中操作时间更短,术后早期并发症发生率更低,值得临床推广。

Objective

To explore the effect of different protocol “cocktail” on early pain control after total knee arthroplasty.

Methods

A total of 114 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis in Shenzhen People's Hospital from January 2023 to June 2024 were enrolled, and the patients with bilateral concurrent replacement were excluded.The patients were divided into four groups according to the intraoperative cocktail formula and administration routes: with morphine + intra-articular perfusion group(morphine perfusion group); with morphine + periarticular injection group (morphine injection group); without morphine + intra-articular perfusion group (perfusion group); without morphine + peri-articular injection group(injection group).Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyze the intraoperative “cocktail” operation time,visual analog scale (VAS) at 24 h and 72 h after surgery, knee joint range of motion (ROM) at 24 h and 72 h after surgery, the proportion of additional analgesic drugs at 72 h after surgery and the occurrence of adverse reactions at 72 h after surgery were analyzed by chi square test.

Results

There was no statistically significant difference inVAS score at 24 h and 72 h after surgery (F=0.363, 0.474), ROM of knee joint at 24 h and 72 h after surgery (F=0.719, 1.606), and the proportion of additional analgesics administered within 72 h (χ2=0.259)(all P>0.05) However, intra-articular perfusion “cocktail” took significantly less operative time (9.5±1.8) s than periarticular injection (41.2±4.9) s (t=-47.60, P<0.01).The overall incidence of adverse reactions within 72 h after surgery was significantly lower in the two groups without morphine than in the two groups with morphine(χ2=8.961, P=0.027), The main manifestations were nausea and vomiting (χ2=7.917, P=0.046).There was no statistically significant difference in incidence of urinary storage, deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or peripheral nerve injury (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Intra-articular perfusion without morphine "cocktail", which is not only effective for early pain control after TKA, but also has shorter intraoperative operation time and lower incidence of early postoperative complications, is worthy of clinical promotion.

表1 4组患者术前一般资料
Table 1 General preoperative data of 4 groups
表2 4组患者术后VAS、ROM及追加止痛药物比例
Table 2 The data of postoperative VAS, ROM and the proportion of additional analgesic drugs in 4 groups
表3 4组患者术后72 h内不良反应发生情况[例(%)]
Table 3 Comparative analysis of the occurrence of adverse reactions in the early postoperative period (within 72 h) in 4 groups[n (%)]
[1]
Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, et al.Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not?[J].ClinOrthopRelat Res, 2010, 468( 1 ): 57-63.
[2]
Gaffney CJ, Pelt CE, Gililland JM, et al.Perioperative pain management in hip and knee arthroplasty[J].OrthopClin North Am,2017, 48( 4 ): 407-419.
[3]
Seangleulur A, Vanasbodeekul P, Prapaitrakool S, et al.The efficacy of local infiltration analgesia in the early postoperative period after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2016, 33( 11 ): 816-831.
[4]
Mortazavi SMJ, Vosoughi F, Yekaninejad M, et al.Comparison of the effect of intra-articular, periarticular, and combined injection of analgesic on pain following total knee arthroplasty: a double-blinded randomized clinical tria[lJ].JB JS Open Access, 2022, 7( 4 ):e22.00074.DOI:10.2106/JBJS.OA.22.00074.
[5]
Gui YK, Xiao R, Luo YR, et al.Analgesic effects of different local infiltration anesthesia techniques combined with femoral nerve block in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled clinical tria[lJ].Local Reg Anesth, 2023, 16: 183-192.
[6]
Wang Q, Sun J, Hu Y, et al.Effects of morphine on peri-articular infiltration analgesia in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective,double-blind, randomized controlled tria[lJ].IntOrthop, 2020, 44( 12 ): 2587-2595.
[7]
Wang Y, Li G, Momin M, et al.Comparison of different local analgesia protocols in postoperative pain management after total knee arthroplasty[J].Braz J Anesthesiol, 2022, 72( 2 ): 267-273.
[8]
Hannon CP, Fillingham YA, Spangehl MJ, et al.The efficacy and safety of periarticular injection in total joint arthroplasty: a direct meta-analysis[J].J Arthroplasty, 2022, 37( 10 ): 1928-1938.e9.
[9]
Wang Q, Tan G, Mohammed A, et al.Adding corticosteroids to periarticular infiltration analgesia improves the short-term analgesic effects after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective,double-blind, randomized controlled tria[lJ].Knee Surg Sports TraumatolArthrosc, 2021, 29( 3 ): 867-875.
[10]
Tsukada S, Wakui M, Hoshino A.The impact of including corticosteroid in a periarticular injection for pain control after total knee arthroplasty: a double-blind randomised controlled tria[lJ].Bone Joint J, 2016, 98-B( 2 ): 194-200.
[11]
Tsukada S, Kurosaka K, Maeda T, et al.Early stage periarticular injection during total knee arthroplasty may provide a better postoperative pain relief than late-stage periarticular injection: a randomized-controlled tria[lJ].Knee Surg Sports TraumatolArthrosc, 2019, 27( 4 ): 1124-1131.
[12]
Deng W, Chen J, Li Q, et al.Comparison of periarticular injection and intra-articular injection for pain management after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].J PerianesthNurs, 2021, 36( 4 ): 406-412.
[13]
Lavand’homme PM, Kehlet H, Rawal N, et al.Pain management after total knee arthroplasty: PROcedureSPEcific Postoperative Pain ManagemenTrecommendations[J].Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2022, 39( 9 ):743-757.
[14]
Garcia JB, Barbosa Neto JO, Vasconcelos JW, et al.Analgesic efficacy of the intra-articular administration of high doses of morphine in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty[J].Rev Bras Anestesiol, 2010, 60( 1 ): 1-12.
[15]
Luo Z, Zeng W, Chen X, et al.Cocktail of ropivacaine, morphine,and diprospan reduces pain and prolongs analgesic effects after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled tria[lJ].Int J ClinPract, 2024, 2024: 3697846.DOI:10.1155/2024/3697846.
[16]
Li Y, Wulamu W, Yushan N, et al.Effects of adding morphine to periarticular infiltration analgesia combined with single dose epidural morphine in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled study[J].OrthopSurg, 2023, 15( 4 ): 1021-1027.
[17]
Stambough JB, Nunley RM, Curry MC, et al.Rapid recovery protocols for primary total hip arthroplasty can safely reduce length of stay without increasing readmissions[J].J Arthroplasty, 2015, 30( 4 ): 521-526.
[18]
Akaravinek P, Kampitak W, Tanavalee A, et al.Effect of adding perineural methylprednisolone to peripheral nerve blocks combined with intravenous dexamethasone for prolonged postdischarge analgesia after fast-track total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled tria[lJ].Clin J Pain, 2023, 39( 4 ): 180-187.
[19]
Wang Q, Zhao C, Hu J, et al.Efficacy of a modified cocktail for periarticular local infiltration analgesia in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled tria[lJ].J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2023, 105( 5 ): 354-362.
[20]
Guild GN 3rd, Galindo RP, Marino J, et al.Periarticular regional analgesia in total knee arthroplasty: a review of the neuroanatomy and injection technique[J].Orthop Clin North Am, 2015, 46( 1 ): 1-8.
[21]
Jain RK, Porat MD, Klingenstein GG, et al.The AAHKS clinical research award: liposomal bupivacaine and periarticular injection are not superior to single-shot intra-articular injection for pain control in total knee arthroplasty[J].J Arthroplasty, 2016, 31( 9 Suppl ): 22-25.
[22]
旷世达, 赵鑫, 苏超, 等.鸡尾酒疗法在全膝关节置换术中不同注射方式的疗效比较[J/OL].中华关节外科杂志( 电子版 ),2021, 15( 6 ): 673-679.
[23]
蔡志清, 许杰, 邱梅玲, 等.“鸡尾酒”注射联合术后加速康复在膝关节置换术的应用[J/OL].中华关节外科杂志( 电子版 ),2020,14( 6 ): 675-679.
[1] 李煜, 王鹏, 陆翮, 冯蓉琴, 韩军涛. 采用低频脉冲电刺激治疗深Ⅱ度烧伤创面的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 474-478.
[2] 高俊颖, 张海洲, 区泓乐, 孙强. FOLFOX-HAIC 为基础的肝细胞癌辅助转化治疗的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 457-463.
[3] 中华医学会器官移植学分会. 腹部常温区域机械灌注在以循环标准判定死亡的遗体器官捐献中的临床应用专家共识[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 386-397.
[4] 中华医学会器官移植学分会. 肝脏体外机械灌注临床应用指南[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 334-345.
[5] 薛庆, 施赛叶, 徐雅文, 盛夏, 张芹芹. 追踪方法学联合失效模式与效应分析在膀胱灌注化疗患者中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 553-559.
[6] 孙璐, 蒋亚玲, 陈凌君. 布托啡诺对脑缺血再灌注损伤大鼠神经炎症和JAK2/STAT3信号通路的影响[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 344-350.
[7] 吴春霖, 侯一夫, 陈凯, 赵冀, 唐世杰, 杨洪吉. 肝动脉灌注化疗联合PD-1/TKI 治疗不可切除性肝癌的安全性和疗效[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 217-224.
[8] 曾士桃, 严庆, 廖珊, 陈焕伟. 肝动脉灌注化疗联合仑伐替尼及PD-1抑制剂与肝动脉灌注化疗联合仑伐替尼治疗不可切除肝癌的疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 225-231.
[9] 徐涵治, 邱洵, 汪恺, 徐骁. 脂肪变性供肝脱脂策略的研究[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 18-24.
[10] 李孟坤, 张雅宾, 敖强国, 何许巍, 刘洋, 陈泓宇, 程庆砾. 三种急性肾脏病小鼠模型的建立及肾脏功能和病理比较[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 18-25.
[11] 侯志博, 李秋璇, 逯瑶, 张苗, 於帆, 卢洁. 多延迟动脉自旋标记成像与CT灌注成像在急性缺血性脑卒中的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(12): 1090-1096.
[12] 李杨春雪, 高杰, 郭文治, 刘智. 远端缺血预处理器官保护与年龄相关性差异研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(12): 1150-1154.
[13] 张颖, 赵鑫, 陈佳梅, 李雁. 术前化疗对CRS+HIPEC 治疗腹膜假黏液瘤预后影响的meta 分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 826-835.
[14] 吴荣昌, 房孝莲, 杨磊, 张诚玥, 赵军阳, 彭芸, 尤佳, 阴捷. 视网膜母细胞瘤动脉灌注化疗的并发症单中心研究分析[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2025, 13(01): 49-53.
[15] 江倩, 王红蕊, 朱玥荃, 李响, 耿晓坤, 李凤武. 药物诱导亚低温对缺血性脑卒中的神经保护作用及DRP-1 调控线粒体功能在其中的潜在分子机制[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 586-594.
阅读次数
全文


摘要